| Balanced or NE | |
|
+3JakeH23 wangtangkiki SteelersPSUfan 7 posters |
Author | Message |
---|
SteelersPSUfan
Posts : 366 Join date : 2010-02-13 Age : 45
| Subject: Balanced or NE Wed Mar 31, 2010 12:26 am | |
| When i use the cowboys I can never decide if the balanced or NE pb is better for them. I use balanced with the chargers and used to use ne with the vikings.
can anyone help me with this decision. if possible could you list what you think are some pros and cons | |
|
| |
wangtangkiki
Posts : 2280 Join date : 2010-02-13
| Subject: Re: Balanced or NE Wed Mar 31, 2010 6:33 am | |
| NE, running the ball is limited.. only tosses.. which you wanna do some off-tackle with Felix Jones.. You do have 2 great CIT guys.. and then Williams whos like 79 CIT.. You have about 5 WRs to work with on the Cowboys.. the two TEs.. then Williams, and Austin. I would use Ogletree as the inside guy in Bunch Wk because that guy goes on flat routes. You want a fast guy to break away from there.
Balanced: You can run and pass very well out of this book.. It has a play that takes hardly any time to setup and can be a touchdown instantly.. There's so many short / quick passes you can do that confuse your opponent.. Full House formation has so many options with only 9 plays. | |
|
| |
JakeH23
Posts : 200 Join date : 2009-11-07 Age : 32 Location : Murfreesboro, TN
| Subject: Re: Balanced or NE Wed Mar 31, 2010 9:45 am | |
| | |
|
| |
JakeH23
Posts : 200 Join date : 2009-11-07 Age : 32 Location : Murfreesboro, TN
| Subject: Re: Balanced or NE Wed Mar 31, 2010 9:46 am | |
| Split slot is deadly, you can come out almost it and run it almost all game. | |
|
| |
jordanl95
Posts : 529 Join date : 2010-02-12 Age : 30 Location : kennett square, PA
| Subject: Re: Balanced or NE Wed Mar 31, 2010 10:46 am | |
| yea, i would also say balanced, i feel balanced is the perfect playbook for the cowboys because of their personnel at WR and Felix Jones | |
|
| |
SteelersPSUfan
Posts : 366 Join date : 2010-02-13 Age : 45
| Subject: Re: Balanced or NE Wed Mar 31, 2010 3:09 pm | |
| ok guys thanks for the help. i think that i will go balanced with the boys as well | |
|
| |
Tyler1281
Posts : 445 Join date : 2010-03-19 Location : Boston, MA
| Subject: Re: Balanced or NE Wed Mar 31, 2010 3:36 pm | |
| i would go with NE but thats just my opinion because i love their PB it has the best pass plays and a bunch of good screens too | |
|
| |
xHHx_JayNizz
Posts : 1521 Join date : 2010-01-24 Age : 33 Location : California
| Subject: Re: Balanced or NE Thu Apr 01, 2010 3:00 am | |
| the one reason i don't run balance anymore is because when i do i become one dimensional, i rely to much on one play and become very predictable. its probably better than the scheme i run but balanced PB just isn't my style. | |
|
| |
wangtangkiki
Posts : 2280 Join date : 2010-02-13
| Subject: Re: Balanced or NE Thu Apr 01, 2010 5:22 am | |
| lol That's why there are other plays in the book though Jay.. I rarely rely on that play.. I do it on 3rd and longs.. but I stick to off tackle, short throws, and tosses. It's fun.. I also mix it several other plays that aren't in the book..
Add the play from weak called Weak Toss I believe into your audibles.. that's a great play, then the quick audible right is a quick throw to L1 like the ones Sgibs does.. it's great. | |
|
| |
SteelersPSUfan
Posts : 366 Join date : 2010-02-13 Age : 45
| Subject: Re: Balanced or NE Thu Apr 01, 2010 3:06 pm | |
| wang do you do any motion w/ the weak toss. also, what other tosses do you do? I was thinking of the I twins and using the rstick to switch sides | |
|
| |
Buccaneer2019
Posts : 70 Join date : 2010-03-20 Age : 29
| Subject: Re: Balanced or NE Wed Apr 14, 2010 12:40 am | |
| Balanced for sure Gotta love that Full House | |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: Balanced or NE | |
| |
|
| |
| Balanced or NE | |
|