| Superbowl - Pitt vs GB | |
|
+6WFColonel56 SteelersPSUfan Militant X 1 TheCrew22 Th3 Ac3r bahdbwoy 10 posters |
Who You Got | Pitt | | 44% | [ 8 ] | GB | | 56% | [ 10 ] |
| Total Votes : 18 | | |
|
Author | Message |
---|
bahdbwoy
Posts : 611 Join date : 2010-03-18
| Subject: Superbowl - Pitt vs GB Sun Jan 23, 2011 9:26 pm | |
| Going to be a very good superbowl | |
|
| |
Th3 Ac3r
Posts : 442 Join date : 2010-01-23 Age : 28 Location : Folsom, LA
| Subject: Re: Superbowl - Pitt vs GB Sun Jan 23, 2011 9:57 pm | |
| Games not over yet.. Dont get ahead of yourself | |
|
| |
TheCrew22
Posts : 507 Join date : 2009-06-24
| Subject: Re: Superbowl - Pitt vs GB Sun Jan 23, 2011 10:54 pm | |
| | |
|
| |
Militant X 1
Posts : 1765 Join date : 2009-07-01 Location : Chesapeake, VA
| Subject: Re: Superbowl - Pitt vs GB Sun Jan 23, 2011 11:39 pm | |
| i'll take the Cheeseheads for $1,000 Alex. lol!
~Mili | |
|
| |
SteelersPSUfan
Posts : 366 Join date : 2010-02-13 Age : 45
| Subject: Re: Superbowl - Pitt vs GB Sun Jan 23, 2011 11:44 pm | |
| You know what it is... Black and Yellow Black and Yellow! | |
|
| |
WFColonel56
Posts : 1729 Join date : 2010-01-25 Age : 31 Location : Roanoke, VA / Greensboro, NC
| Subject: Re: Superbowl - Pitt vs GB Mon Jan 24, 2011 2:19 am | |
| GB ftw......
reasons why
1.Pitt has a notorius weak pass D and GB can sling that thang. 2. After the preformance GB put up vs ATL they have to win it all
so i said it ,it shall happen (remember i said that SEA would beat NO) | |
|
| |
Kingz
Posts : 206 Join date : 2010-12-06 Age : 33 Location : Florida
| Subject: Re: Superbowl - Pitt vs GB Mon Jan 24, 2011 3:43 am | |
| i like aaron rodgers but i think the steelers d is going to be to much i got pitt getting yet another superbowl title | |
|
| |
nathanas85
Posts : 80 Join date : 2010-01-29
| Subject: Re: Superbowl - Pitt vs GB Wed Jan 26, 2011 10:04 pm | |
| - WFColonel56 wrote:
- GB ftw......
reasons why
1.Pitt has a notorius weak pass D and GB can sling that thang. 2. After the preformance GB put up vs ATL they have to win it all
so i said it ,it shall happen (remember i said that SEA would beat NO) And to rebuttal statement 1: The Pittsburgh 2010 pass defense You are basing your hypothetical as a aggregate but not breaking down the stats. During the course of the tail end NFL Teams started running the ball less on Pittsburgh and pass more, i.e. because teams could not run the ball on Pittsburgh. Pittsburgh had passes attempted on their defense 65+ more times than Green Bay as a result and Pittsburgh allowed less yardage than Green Bay. GB (6.5) Pitt (6.3). Now look at the playoffs. Pittsburgh has allowed 5.7 yards per pass play where as Green Bay has yielded 6.9. So the notorious weak pass defense of 2010 is a myth. As for statement 2: Pittsburgh also beat Atlanta with their 3rd string QB in OT. Yes, it was not the throttling Green Bay handed Atlanta but last time I recalled style points do not matter. If weekly style points were a factor then New England should not have lost their first playoff game against the Jets. I actually think both teams have a 50/50 shot at winning the Lombardi. It is a coin flip but of course I want the Steelers to win. | |
|
| |
ubert123
Posts : 294 Join date : 2010-02-07 Age : 30 Location : Nashville
| Subject: Re: Superbowl - Pitt vs GB Thu Jan 27, 2011 2:02 am | |
| two words...... Dick LeBeau | |
|
| |
Kingz
Posts : 206 Join date : 2010-12-06 Age : 33 Location : Florida
| Subject: Re: Superbowl - Pitt vs GB Thu Jan 27, 2011 7:03 am | |
| | |
|
| |
TheCrew22
Posts : 507 Join date : 2009-06-24
| Subject: Re: Superbowl - Pitt vs GB Thu Jan 27, 2011 3:13 pm | |
| ^^ lol...
should be a real gg though.. capers and lebeau both run similar defenses but i expect to see alot of big plays in this game.. of course the pack comes out with the W though! | |
|
| |
WFColonel56
Posts : 1729 Join date : 2010-01-25 Age : 31 Location : Roanoke, VA / Greensboro, NC
| Subject: Re: Superbowl - Pitt vs GB Thu Jan 27, 2011 4:13 pm | |
| - nathanas85 wrote:
- WFColonel56 wrote:
- GB ftw......
reasons why
1.Pitt has a notorius weak pass D and GB can sling that thang. 2. After the preformance GB put up vs ATL they have to win it all
so i said it ,it shall happen (remember i said that SEA would beat NO) And to rebuttal statement 1: The Pittsburgh 2010 pass defense You are basing your hypothetical as a aggregate but not breaking down the stats. During the course of the tail end NFL Teams started running the ball less on Pittsburgh and pass more, i.e. because teams could not run the ball on Pittsburgh. Pittsburgh had passes attempted on their defense 65+ more times than Green Bay as a result and Pittsburgh allowed less yardage than Green Bay. GB (6.5) Pitt (6.3). Now look at the playoffs. Pittsburgh has allowed 5.7 yards per pass play where as Green Bay has yielded 6.9. So the notorious weak pass defense of 2010 is a myth.
As for statement 2: Pittsburgh also beat Atlanta with their 3rd string QB in OT. Yes, it was not the throttling Green Bay handed Atlanta but last time I recalled style points do not matter. If weekly style points were a factor then New England should not have lost their first playoff game against the Jets.
I actually think both teams have a 50/50 shot at winning the Lombardi. It is a coin flip but of course I want the Steelers to win. the point i was trying to make was that pitts pass D is their weak link, and the passing game is GBs strong point. i never even stated anything about GBs defense so comparing GBs D vd Pitts D wasnt what I was getting at. But as far as ATL goes Pitt beat them in like week 1......GB beat them in the playoffs when they were on a hot streak, yes they lost to NO by3. Pitt did nothin special to win the game. Yes style points dont count but they do make a statement. GB dismounted an ATL D that looked very good in their last 2 games.. | |
|
| |
xxPaTrioTs
Posts : 85 Join date : 2010-03-27 Age : 30
| Subject: Re: Superbowl - Pitt vs GB Thu Jan 27, 2011 8:38 pm | |
| - Th3 Ac3r wrote:
- Games not over yet.. Dont get ahead of yourself
He didn't say anything about the result of the game? Just opinions about who everyone is going for... | |
|
| |
TheCrew22
Posts : 507 Join date : 2009-06-24
| Subject: Re: Superbowl - Pitt vs GB Thu Feb 03, 2011 4:50 pm | |
| Wayne likes the pack too
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=md2CwsTC4LQ | |
|
| |
TheCrew22
Posts : 507 Join date : 2009-06-24
| Subject: Re: Superbowl - Pitt vs GB Sun Feb 06, 2011 1:24 am | |
| Green and yellow green and yellow
Pack 28-24.. ARod MVP | |
|
| |
Militant X 1
Posts : 1765 Join date : 2009-07-01 Location : Chesapeake, VA
| Subject: Re: Superbowl - Pitt vs GB Wed Feb 09, 2011 11:37 am | |
| - ubert123 wrote:
- two words...... Dick LeBeau
two words........ STEELERS LOSE!being a Ravens fan i couldn't resist that one Ubert! ~Mili | |
|
| |
ubert123
Posts : 294 Join date : 2010-02-07 Age : 30 Location : Nashville
| Subject: Re: Superbowl - Pitt vs GB Wed Feb 09, 2011 6:20 pm | |
| haha thats fine but while they were out there playin, the man in your sig was watchin from baltimore lol | |
|
| |
Militant X 1
Posts : 1765 Join date : 2009-07-01 Location : Chesapeake, VA
| Subject: Re: Superbowl - Pitt vs GB Thu Feb 10, 2011 7:48 pm | |
| - ubert123 wrote:
- haha thats fine but while they were out there playin, the man in your sig was watchin from baltimore lol
that's cool.... but while the man in my sig was at home watching from baltimore thinking about how the Ravens "gave" that AFC Divisional game to the Steelers after being up 21-7 at the half.....the man in your sig was a absolute non-factor in the Super Bowl! he str8 got exposed so badly.....that he might as well been on the couch with the man in my sig watching from home as well. lol! ~Mili | |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: Superbowl - Pitt vs GB | |
| |
|
| |
| Superbowl - Pitt vs GB | |
|