i think baltimore..but then again who knows how the game will play still they have an insane amount of speed on defense and even some on offense ray rice 97 acc and donte stallworth 94 speed whos better really cowboys maybe

yeah but they don't have a real RC threat, i think the cowboys will still be the best.

Colts, at least for me maybe steelers as a second choice depends how the running game is this year.




haseo15

People will stick with the cowbitches bc it's basically the same team but better and they are already comfortable with them...

Aside from them I think the jets and ravens will be a little more used- at least in the begining.. Then you have your tebow users.. Then the standards like colts/Pitt/sd/pats

jets ftw

94 spd
94 spd
93 spd
91 spd WRs

a fast rb and a bruser rb
an ok qb










an you already knw what the defense looks like

Jets don't have a fast RB [unless you call 91 speed fast].. The defense has 1 LB over 80 speed.. Jets are definitely not the best team.. The LBs all have 88 or less accel.. I'm not sure if that's good or bad for a LB lol.. Broncos have several 88+ accel LBs, plus they have better speed than the Jets.. Elvis Dumervil = 86 speed, 97 accel :O; DJ Will: 83 speed - 89 accel.. I guess we will see what good accel means when we get the game.


Cowboys/Raiders.. Ravens need a better height+speed WR combination..

Broncos are up near the top.. We lost Marshall, but we gained a 6'3" 96 speed WR with 78? CIT.. He's faster than marshall which is really good for my scheme, but he can't catch as well.. + Tebow will be a great up the gut runner



Btw, the Chargers secondary is SLOW.. The Chargers were a good team in M10.. but in M11, they have NO fast CBs.. Only 2 of their 11 secondary members have OVER 90 acceleration.. NONE of their secondary is over 89 speed..

I'll have to say the saints, they have the complete team, good receivers, quarterback, and fast runing back in Reggie bush, but as Gibs said they have a slow secondary

STEELERS have it all......

-possesion reciever (Hines Ward 90 catch)
-fast reciever (Mike Wallace/ Emmanuel Sanders 96 speed)
-rc reciever (Heath Miller/Matt Spaeth 6'7" 86 jump)
-fast RB (Steffon Logan 93 speed)
-bruiser RB (Rashard Mendenhall 93 truck)
-best LB core in the game
-best safety in the game (Troy Palamalu 97 overall)
-hard hitting safety (Ryan Clark 93 hit power and 99 overall cause im usering him!)
-great QB (Big Ben, nuff said)
-mobile QB (Denis Dixon 84 speed)

not only am i a die hard steeler fan, but im very happy to have basically the same weapons at my disposal from this year
-HH

mm , i guess that they could be a trea t i'll watch out for Denis Dixon whenever i play online, he could be the next Vick

yeah the steelers look nice for next year but i'd still say cowboys

they still have a great RB and WR/TE core with speed and great height
Romo is agile and can get it done in the air
And they have Demarcus ware and pat watkins
not to mention all the speed that they have in the secondary with newman, ball, jenkins
And just to add the cherry on top they have a 97 kick power kicker.

did anyone see the video with boldin doing wat appeared to be a rc? maybe height wont matter as much this year or maybe there is no rcing at all never know

I use pitt as my second option, i do like the steelers though first option is usually colts. I do like the colts linebacker core plus the colts might have the best pass rush in the game with Freeny Mathis and now jerry hughes.





haseo15

The only thing the Steelers are missing is a fast RC WR.. They have all the pieces, but in different players ._.

VaBeach, Do you have James Farrior as a starting LB? I don't like that he only has 75 spd.. Since LBs cover TEs or RBs, usually a RB will outrun him.. [Felix Jones specifically.. Most tourney players use the Cowboys]


The Steelers have the best OVR rating of LBs, but I would probably have the Ravens LBs instead just because they have so many 80 speed LBs that I would be able to put them at DE for more speed..

Name - OVR - Speed

Ray Lewis 94 -82sp
Suggs 90 -84sp
Kindle 78 -82spd
Barnes 72 -86spd
Ellerbe 71 -83spd
Gooden 70 -86spd
McClain 63 -81spd


Harrison 97 -85spd
Woodley 91 -83spd
Timmons 82 -85spd
Gibson 70 -84spd
Worilds 65 -80spd

lol, how did Curtis painter get 83 short accuracy thats a joke.




haseo15

Bengals aren't looking too shabby