|
|
| Author | Message |
|---|
Pro InstinctZ

Posts: 90 Join date: 2010-10-14
 | Subject: Chicago Bears Top 5??? Wed Nov 03, 2010 7:09 pm | |
| With the cowboys declining, who will you use to replace them I honestly will go with the Chicago Bears. Only if the Cowboys ratings start becoming serious you know Jamarcus Russel like ratings |
|
 | |
steelersfan0023
Posts: 191 Join date: 2009-09-21
 | Subject: Re: Chicago Bears Top 5??? Wed Nov 03, 2010 7:10 pm | |
| Bears are a solid team just lacking a running back |
|
 | |
Ryker3

Posts: 180 Join date: 2010-08-29 Location: West Coast
 | Subject: Re: Chicago Bears Top 5??? Wed Nov 03, 2010 7:13 pm | |
| Forte is a tank who can catch the ball. |
|
 | |
steelersfan0023
Posts: 191 Join date: 2009-09-21
 | Subject: Re: Chicago Bears Top 5??? Wed Nov 03, 2010 7:14 pm | |
| but he is super slow he isn't a good madden back |
|
 | |
Pro InstinctZ

Posts: 90 Join date: 2010-10-14
 | Subject: Re: Chicago Bears Top 5??? Wed Nov 03, 2010 7:19 pm | |
| He's not a bad madden back either your not going to get the cowboys player by player but Forte can hold his own |
|
 | |
steelersfan0023
Posts: 191 Join date: 2009-09-21
 | Subject: Re: Chicago Bears Top 5??? Wed Nov 03, 2010 7:22 pm | |
| bears are a good team all im saying is they are weak at RB forte is sub par |
|
 | |
Alyoyo

Posts: 299 Join date: 2010-09-12
 | Subject: Re: Chicago Bears Top 5??? Wed Nov 03, 2010 7:44 pm | |
| Bears are nice. Forte is alright. 91 speed though(last I checked)
Only thing is Tillman is 86 speed and doesnt fit at #1CB but the real problem is idk who to replace him with |
|
 | |
wangtangkiki

Posts: 2280 Join date: 2010-02-13
 | Subject: Re: Chicago Bears Top 5??? Wed Nov 03, 2010 8:30 pm | |
| The Bears aren't top 5, but they definitely are Top 15.. That sounds bad.. but it isn't.. I have them ranked at #11 on my list to fit my scheme.. They are a solid team.. Speed WR.. Forte is like 90-92 speed.. that's still decent.. that definitely drags them out of the top 5 because they don't have enough talent at WR to carry the weight..
A team like the Broncos have a crappy RB.. [Moreno.. 88 speed/97 acc..] but they have 4 WRs that are great.. Demaryius Thomas - beast that's 6'3" 96 speed 92 acc.. Royal 95 spd, 98 acc.. Decker 86 CIT 6'3".. Lloyd 90 speed 92 acc, 92 Route running, 96 spec catch.. They make up for a lack of a RB..
A team like the Ravens sorta make up for their lack at RB, but sorta don't.. They make up for it w/ their defense.. but The Broncos/Ravens are in the same boat.. Slow speed, high acc RB.. The Broncos have better WRs.. the Ravens have great CIT WRs but little speed.. only Stallworth.. The Ravens have an excellent defense.. 2nd best in the game.. but the Broncos are also not slackers either with 4 90 speed CBs.. Brian Dawkins / David Bruton [6'2" 88 spd SS] as your two safeties.. Your LBs are great.. Dumervil.. DJ Williams.. Woodyard [85 spd LB..] Jarvis Moss [6'7" 79 spd 85/88 acc LB.. that I put at DE..] Ayers [79 spd LB that I also put at DE.. he has good rating at DE I believe.. like 87 OVR..] _________________ PSN: wangtangkiki MB's Most Helpful Member 2010! MB's Member of the Year 2010!Thank you guys, I appreciate it. Madden is my passion. So are spreadsheets. Any video requests for M12? Email me: wangtangkiki@gmail.com |
|
 | |
bahdbwoy
Posts: 611 Join date: 2010-03-18
 | Subject: Re: Chicago Bears Top 5??? Wed Nov 03, 2010 9:13 pm | |
| Bears wr drop balls too easy but I can play with them..wouldn't say top5 |
|
 | |
jalapenos789

Posts: 173 Join date: 2010-09-19
 | Subject: Re: Chicago Bears Top 5??? Wed Nov 03, 2010 9:20 pm | |
| Wang, good point..
I was looking into the Broncos, but I'm not sure how to setup my LB core to make the 46 best. How does your LB deptch chart go? |
|
 | |
wangtangkiki

Posts: 2280 Join date: 2010-02-13
 | Subject: Re: Chicago Bears Top 5??? Wed Nov 03, 2010 11:18 pm | |
| | jalapenos789 wrote: | Wang, good point..
I was looking into the Broncos, but I'm not sure how to setup my LB core to make the 46 best. How does your LB deptch chart go? |
Well I use the 46 Speed package because I like having speed on the field to compete w/ the Raiders/Saints/Lions..
I set my depth chart up so it conforms with both the Normal and Speed package. I would put Dumervil at MLB. He covers RBs usually.. It depends.. Your MLB will either cover a RB if there are two WRs on the left, or he will cover a TE or a slot WR if there is just 1 WR on the left.. In 2-back formations, he will cover the right RB..
I would go with this setup:
LOLB: Williams - He will be on the right of the field. I put him here because he's the 3rd fastest, but just because he's not the fastest, doesn't mean he isn't good. He has very high tackle w/ 94.. and high hit power.. The LOLB will cover TEs vs. most formations.. [If your opponent comes out in 3 wr.. I'd go w/ speed package.]
MLB: Dumervil - I explained it earlier, but yeah, I would have Dumervil here because he has 84 or so tackle & is just absolutely fast.. 86 spd, but 97 accel.. He's almost as fast as Ray Rice or Knowshon Moreno.. He will usually be covering TEs/RBs.. He's fast enough to cover both..
ROLB: Woodyard - He's your 2nd fastest LB. I put him at this position because he will actually be on the left side of the field. He will cover RBs usually.. I would have my fastest player here, but the possibility that my MLB could go up against a WR is worth the risk of putting a slower [not by much] guy at my OLB position.
Btw, if you run the 46 speed package a lot, you want to set your depth chart for MLB up like this:
MLB1: Fastest MLB MLB2: 2nd Fast MLB [EVEN IF HE PLAYS ROLB OR LOLB]
Ex:
MLB1: Dumervil MLB2: Williams
You do that because when you come out in the speed package and your MLB gets tired, you want your 2nd best LB to replace him.. well put your 2nd best LB as his backup.. even if he is a starter.
_________________ PSN: wangtangkiki MB's Most Helpful Member 2010! MB's Member of the Year 2010!Thank you guys, I appreciate it. Madden is my passion. So are spreadsheets. Any video requests for M12? Email me: wangtangkiki@gmail.com |
|
 | |
Ryker3

Posts: 180 Join date: 2010-08-29 Location: West Coast
 | Subject: Re: Chicago Bears Top 5??? Thu Nov 04, 2010 1:03 am | |
| WTK -
You just made my defense so much better. I had never thought to switch back to 46 Normal package in a heavier offensive set.
Now I can get Mitchell and McClain on the field! |
|
 | |
Dalton Big D
Posts: 405 Join date: 2010-08-01
 | Subject: Re: Chicago Bears Top 5??? Thu Nov 04, 2010 1:14 am | |
| champ bailey is still vey good ppl forget he has 95 speed still, goodman is also a good corner on the short side tho, a gem is there 6th corner hes 5'11'' 59 ovr doesnt matter tho 95 speed 92 acc. USER HIM...ALL DAY |
|
 | |
jalapenos789

Posts: 173 Join date: 2010-09-19
 | Subject: Re: Chicago Bears Top 5??? Thu Nov 04, 2010 2:12 am | |
| | Ryker3 wrote: | WTK -
You just made my defense so much better. I had never thought to switch back to 46 Normal package in a heavier offensive set.
Now I can get Mitchell and McClain on the field! |
Word. Haha, thanks WTK. I always just stayed in 46 speed, with some nickel strong mixed in haha. |
|
 | |
wangtangkiki

Posts: 2280 Join date: 2010-02-13
 | Subject: Re: Chicago Bears Top 5??? Thu Nov 04, 2010 3:44 am | |
| Yeah guys, I just thought of it myself when typing.. It's pretty obvious, but it will help.. Also, if you play a team like the Colts/49ers.. remember they have a beast at TE so don't forget to include Clark/Davis as WRs.. | Dalton Big D wrote: | | champ bailey is still vey good ppl forget he has 95 speed still, goodman is also a good corner on the short side tho, a gem is there 6th corner hes 5'11'' 59 ovr doesnt matter tho 95 speed 92 acc. USER HIM...ALL DAY |
Yeah, Cassius Vaughn is awesome.. I actually have him as my 3rd CB.. Nickel Strong - NB Blitz, he's the blitzer.. He also works in coverage because his recovery speed._________________ PSN: wangtangkiki MB's Most Helpful Member 2010! MB's Member of the Year 2010!Thank you guys, I appreciate it. Madden is my passion. So are spreadsheets. Any video requests for M12? Email me: wangtangkiki@gmail.com |
|
 | |
|