Madden 10 Playbooks?

What playbooks r u guys going to lab first in madden 10?
i will probably lab the run n gun because that is what i used this year and they have got hb direct snap now, i saw a video of the run n gun playbook at e3 and it looked good so i will probably use that as well as the 46 defense because the defensive playbooks never really change alot between games and i used it through madden 09.

run n gun no longer has i form twin te nor does it have Trips Te.

the power of Run n Gun is gone. Its still a good book but its going to be equal to all the rest.


Ill check out Indy first...of course...then MIA due to the fact that it will have the most wildcat plays compared to other teams. I will also check out BAL it has an unbalanced shotgun set and unbalanced under center set. should be interseting to see.

of course though I spend most my time in the begining stages of every season analyzing EVERY book to see if tehres any unique formations or plays.

I will check out Indianapolis at first because that is what I used this year. Then I will go through every single playbook and look for something interesting. Most people will be using the same few playbooks so I will most likely use Indianapolis until I see what the favorites are. I want to use a playbook that isn't overused.

new england first, just b/c of my roots to the patriots.

but i dunno, i just like to putz around and dabble here and there until something sparkly catches my eye...

i3rian 87 wrote:

new england first, just b/c of my roots to the patriots.

Oakland will most likely be one of the first few I check out for the same reason.

Before i find what PB i need to know what works in the game. If singleback is good then maybe a PB with great singleback formations. But next year the most important thing to me is being unique and creative. I want even the best defensive players to pull out their hair while attempting to stop my offense.

sgibs7 wrote:

run n gun no longer has i form twin te nor does it have Trips Te.

the power of Run n Gun is gone. Its still a good book but its going to be equal to all the rest.


Ill check out Indy first...of course...then MIA due to the fact that it will have the most wildcat plays compared to other teams. I will also check out BAL it has an unbalanced shotgun set and unbalanced under center set. should be interseting to see.

of course though I spend most my time in the begining stages of every season analyzing EVERY book to see if tehres any unique formations or plays.

Do u think we will see the wildcat used at MC

Patsfan26 wrote:

Do u think we will see the wildcat used at MC

Obviously some people are going to use it. It just depends on how effective it is.

Chill bud I meant do u think the majority of people will use it like top ballers. People like problem and chow.

west coast and seatle first.seatle was beast in 09 hoping it's the same in 10. west coast because undercenter is supposed to dominate then maybe pass balanced bcuz it might still have trips te if it dont then fuck it lol.but ima try detroit's 2 and a few others but i wanna c which 1's r popular bcuz i dont like using overused playbooks(i did at begining of year with run n gun but then changed it cuz so many people new my scheme lol).

I'm trying MIA, KC, NE, and anything that has the best running sets. Since next year the no huddle running will be my strategy MC

I'm going to start with Run n Gun, and then just work my way through some of the playbooks i used this year (Pass Bal, Indy, Run Bal) and also take a look at MIA because of all the wildcat that i assume it will have in it

^crew run n gun IN MY OPINION will be complete shit next year no trips te no iform twin te but pass balanced might be the next run and gun if it has trips te in it.

Agree probably, but Im gonna just like to look and see whats all out of it. Pass Balanced is a nice playbook but it has virtually no running formations and thats what kills it for me. If it gets 1 decent running formation i very well may end up starting there.

I'll probley stick with the Dolphins PB all year long

On D and Offensive since the 3-4 is suppose to be better this year.

Flats Dolphins fan wrote:

I'll probley stick with the Dolphins PB all year long

On D and Offensive since the 3-4 is suppose to be better this year.

3-4 was beast imo last year whenever i wasnt using the raiders i was using that or multi D for some rason i could stop the run quite well even with only 3 down lineman and yeh dolphins most likely have the most wildcat forms with 12 so they shouldnt have bad pb's.

3-4 was a "hot mess" this year.

1-5-5 locked up the running game!

sgibs7 wrote:

3-4 was a "hot mess" this year.

1-5-5 locked up the running game!

hot mess ?and yeh 1-5-5 isa beast if u run it right.i actually won a game cuz of it 2day.btw sgibs r u still doing that challenge to become first on xbox 360?

chris wrote:

btw sgibs r u still doing that challenge to become first on xbox 360?

No he stopped it. I don't know why but it was most likely because of people glitching him.

ELeiser17 wrote:

chris wrote:

btw sgibs r u still doing that challenge to become first on xbox 360?

No, he stopped it. I don't know why, it was most likely because of people glitching him.

I played 38 games.

I lost 3.

All three players QB walked me and still didnt beat me until they disconnected me and I got losses lol.

I was 35-0 in my other games.

I have like a 26 game winstreak.

I made it to the 34th ranked played during the month of May while I was doing this.

Madden 09 was just not worth it anymore at that point. There is NO DOUBT in my mind I would have made it to number 1.

For what it matters I beat 4 of the guys that were in the top 10.

ELeiser17 wrote:

chris wrote:

btw sgibs r u still doing that challenge to become first on xbox 360?

No, he stopped it. I don't know why, it was most likely because of people glitching him.

ahh yeh i dont blame him lol.i wanna get top 100 on ps3 b4 the years up but idk if i can be assed 2. i mean im current 1534 ..and wow nice man ur a beast = D.

sgibs7 wrote:

For what it matters I beat 4 of the guys that were in the top 10.

Do you have names?

ELeiser17 wrote:

sgibs7 wrote:

For what it matters I beat 4 of the guys that were in the top 10.

Do you have names?

why dont blive him ?

chris wrote:

why dont blive him ?

I believe him, I'm just curious who he beat.

ELeiser17 wrote:

chris wrote:

why dont blive him ?

I believe him, I'm just curious who he beat.

yeh me 2.