| Getting TE at WR without audibling | |
|
+4WFColonel56 SasserAssassin greenmile gassman9225 8 posters |
|
Author | Message |
---|
gassman9225
Posts : 18 Join date : 2011-01-30
| Subject: Getting TE at WR without audibling Fri Feb 18, 2011 8:30 pm | |
| I just played a guy who killed me with Tight Doubles..but somehow he was getting his WR at TE without audibling anything...anybody got an idea how he did this? | |
|
| |
greenmile
Posts : 95 Join date : 2009-11-08 Location : Minneapple
| Subject: Re: Getting TE at WR without audibling Fri Feb 18, 2011 8:34 pm | |
| There is a 4 wr package, its only in Bmores playbook | |
|
| |
SasserAssassin
Posts : 589 Join date : 2010-12-22 Age : 27
| Subject: Re: Getting TE at WR without audibling Fri Feb 18, 2011 8:34 pm | |
| the playbook is bal. there is a hidden formation in doubles flex. if you have hb wideout package in it lets the rb play te. | |
|
| |
gassman9225
Posts : 18 Join date : 2011-01-30
| Subject: Re: Getting TE at WR without audibling Fri Feb 18, 2011 8:41 pm | |
| | |
|
| |
gassman9225
Posts : 18 Join date : 2011-01-30
| Subject: Re: Getting TE at WR without audibling Fri Feb 18, 2011 9:07 pm | |
| does baltimore have any other hidden formations? | |
|
| |
WFColonel56
Posts : 1729 Join date : 2010-01-25 Age : 32 Location : Roanoke, VA / Greensboro, NC
| Subject: Re: Getting TE at WR without audibling Fri Feb 18, 2011 9:08 pm | |
| .................what happened to that sticky?... zan lol | |
|
| |
MisterMazin
Posts : 365 Join date : 2010-12-10
| Subject: Re: Getting TE at WR without audibling Fri Feb 18, 2011 9:29 pm | |
| | |
|
| |
SasserAssassin
Posts : 589 Join date : 2010-12-22 Age : 27
| Subject: Re: Getting TE at WR without audibling Fri Feb 18, 2011 9:50 pm | |
| - Boldin wrote:
- how many threads lol
at least 10 just on these fourms. like 50 if you count all the websites. jeez | |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Getting TE at WR without audibling Fri Feb 18, 2011 10:58 pm | |
| Goodness, it can't be THAT hard to stop. |
|
| |
gassman9225
Posts : 18 Join date : 2011-01-30
| Subject: Re: Getting TE at WR without audibling Sat Feb 19, 2011 12:21 am | |
| lol, this is the first time ive seen or heard of it so i figured id ask here...most people here arent shy about sharing "secrets" | |
|
| |
xHHx_megatron
Posts : 1335 Join date : 2010-04-05 Age : 36 Location : sooner state
| Subject: Re: Getting TE at WR without audibling Sat Feb 19, 2011 4:09 am | |
| | |
|
| |
SasserAssassin
Posts : 589 Join date : 2010-12-22 Age : 27
| Subject: Re: Getting TE at WR without audibling Sat Feb 19, 2011 4:13 am | |
| | |
|
| |
WFColonel56
Posts : 1729 Join date : 2010-01-25 Age : 32 Location : Roanoke, VA / Greensboro, NC
| Subject: Re: Getting TE at WR without audibling Sat Feb 19, 2011 12:38 pm | |
| thats why i asked for that sticky.....zan | |
|
| |
Ant1010
Posts : 577 Join date : 2010-01-21
| Subject: Re: Getting TE at WR without audibling Sat Feb 19, 2011 11:03 pm | |
| Strong Close goes harder then tight doubles mam, strong close is tough | |
|
| |
SasserAssassin
Posts : 589 Join date : 2010-12-22 Age : 27
| Subject: Re: Getting TE at WR without audibling Sat Feb 19, 2011 11:17 pm | |
| - Ant1010 wrote:
- Strong Close goes harder then tight doubles mam, strong close is tough
Im pretty sure MY tight doubles is tuffer than your strong close. Strong close is on lock. | |
|
| |
gassman9225
Posts : 18 Join date : 2011-01-30
| Subject: Re: Getting TE at WR without audibling Sun Feb 20, 2011 12:27 am | |
| - SasserAssassin wrote:
- Ant1010 wrote:
- Strong Close goes harder then tight doubles mam, strong close is tough
Im pretty sure MY tight doubles is tuffer than your strong close. Strong close is on lock.
neither of yall fuckin with my tight doubles or my strong close lol | |
|
| |
SasserAssassin
Posts : 589 Join date : 2010-12-22 Age : 27
| Subject: Re: Getting TE at WR without audibling Sun Feb 20, 2011 12:36 am | |
| - gassman9225 wrote:
- SasserAssassin wrote:
- Ant1010 wrote:
- Strong Close goes harder then tight doubles mam, strong close is tough
Im pretty sure MY tight doubles is tuffer than your strong close. Strong close is on lock.
neither of yall fuckin with my tight doubles or my strong close lol if you wanna experince my tight doubles then hit me up for a game. GT:Sasserassassin | |
|
| |
Ant1010
Posts : 577 Join date : 2010-01-21
| Subject: Re: Getting TE at WR without audibling Sun Feb 20, 2011 1:13 am | |
| When you get a ps3 we can get in a game in. You have only 2 runs to work with in your tight doubles, and a couple of unbumps. Tight Shakes is a nice play, i don't know how much fire power you have left after it, but it's all he say blahzay blah, until we play and fyi, i don't even run strong close and i;m saying it goes hard. | |
|
| |
SasserAssassin
Posts : 589 Join date : 2010-12-22 Age : 27
| Subject: Re: Getting TE at WR without audibling Sun Feb 20, 2011 1:15 am | |
| - Ant1010 wrote:
- When you get a ps3 we can get in a game in. You have only 2 runs to work with in your tight doubles, and a couple of unbumps. Tight Shakes is a nice play, i don't know how much fire power you have left after it, but it's all he say blahzay blah, until we play and fyi, i don't even run strong close and i;m saying it goes hard.
i dont even run that wack a** tight doubles out of BAL. i run my stuff out of zona. | |
|
| |
MisterMazin
Posts : 365 Join date : 2010-12-10
| Subject: Re: Getting TE at WR without audibling Sun Feb 20, 2011 1:45 am | |
| sasser you got caged all game buddy, stop gassin | |
|
| |
WFColonel56
Posts : 1729 Join date : 2010-01-25 Age : 32 Location : Roanoke, VA / Greensboro, NC
| Subject: Re: Getting TE at WR without audibling Sun Feb 20, 2011 1:46 am | |
| still waiting on that sticky........ZAN | |
|
| |
SasserAssassin
Posts : 589 Join date : 2010-12-22 Age : 27
| Subject: Re: Getting TE at WR without audibling Sun Feb 20, 2011 1:51 am | |
| - Boldin wrote:
- sasser you got caged all game buddy, stop gassin
i didnt run my zona tight doubles | |
|
| |
xHHx_megatron
Posts : 1335 Join date : 2010-04-05 Age : 36 Location : sooner state
| Subject: Re: Getting TE at WR without audibling Sun Feb 20, 2011 2:13 am | |
| strong close/tight doubles is on lockdown. smh, most overused formations in the game, so everyone should be able to defend it. | |
|
| |
MisterMazin
Posts : 365 Join date : 2010-12-10
| Subject: Re: Getting TE at WR without audibling Sun Feb 20, 2011 2:34 am | |
| - xHHx_megatron wrote:
- strong close/tight doubles is on lockdown. smh, most overused formations in the game, so everyone should be able to defend it.
there it is. | |
|
| |
Ant1010
Posts : 577 Join date : 2010-01-21
| Subject: Re: Getting TE at WR without audibling Sun Feb 20, 2011 9:37 am | |
| That makes no sense Mega, just because you know what comings, doesn't mean that much. When it isn;t abused and used all game it isn't locked up, hell even if it is, it has a counter for anything the defense wants to do. Tight Doubles from a book is tough to defend, i thought you meant that B-more tight doubles | |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: Getting TE at WR without audibling | |
| |
|
| |
| Getting TE at WR without audibling | |
|