Getting TE at WR without audibling

Posts : 365 Join date : 2010-12-10

tight doubles and strong close are pretty easy to defend. The only person ive played that has a unique Strong is K*.

Subject: Re: Getting TE at WR without audibling Sun Feb 20, 2011 12:58 pm

Ant1010 wrote:: That makes no sense Mega, just because you know what comings, doesn't mean that much. When it isn;t abused and used all game it isn't locked up, hell even if it is, it has a counter for anything the defense wants to do. Tight Doubles from a book is tough to defend, i thought you meant that B-more tight doubles

Tight doubles is ok..but yah it is limited. C routes only good for once maybe twice. run plays limited... If people only run compression sets just for man switches, well it def will get locked up.

To be honest, strong close is much harder to defend.

Posts : 577 Join date : 2010-01-21

I know, that's what i'm saying lol

Posts : 241 Join date : 2010-11-01

SasserAssassin wrote:

Ant1010 wrote:: Strong Close goes harder then tight doubles mam, strong close is tough

Im pretty sure MY tight doubles is tuffer than your strong close.
Strong close is on lock.

I'm pretty sure my 34 rush had your tight doubles in a cage Smile

Posts : 577 Join date : 2010-01-21

lol he wasn't using Zona is what he will tell you
lol

Posts : 589 Join date : 2010-12-22 Age : 27

Tru Statement wrote:

SasserAssassin wrote:

Ant1010 wrote:: Strong Close goes harder then tight doubles mam, strong close is tough

Im pretty sure MY tight doubles is tuffer than your strong close.
Strong close is on lock.

I'm pretty sure my 34 rush had your tight doubles in a cage Smile

i got a diffrent one for this 1.
I didnt play you.

Posts : 18 Join date : 2011-01-30

lol, hit me up for a game anytime bro

aim thomasg9225
psn gassman9225
xbl xxdagassmanxx

Posts : 589 Join date : 2010-12-22 Age : 27

gassman9225 wrote:: lol, hit me up for a game anytime bro

aim thomasg9225
psn gassman9225
xbl xxdagassmanxx

aight i dont run tight doubles that much any more but i will run the throw back stuff every once in a while.
no gassin Razz

Posts : 241 Join date : 2010-11-01

SasserAssassin wrote:

Tru Statement wrote:

SasserAssassin wrote:

Ant1010 wrote:: Strong Close goes harder then tight doubles mam, strong close is tough

Im pretty sure MY tight doubles is tuffer than your strong close.
Strong close is on lock.

I'm pretty sure my 34 rush had your tight doubles in a cage Smile

i got a diffrent one for this 1.
I didnt play you.

Yes you did lol. You were the packers and ran tight doubles and I pretty much sacked or hit u b4 u could get the ball off everytime so you kept audibling down to a run heavy thing and teying to run .. and you quit in the third and said 'im done' when I was up big and the score was so bad I decided not to post it in the thread where o was asking for games so I didn't looklike an *******

Posts : 589 Join date : 2010-12-22 Age : 27

Tru Statement wrote:

SasserAssassin wrote:

Tru Statement wrote:

SasserAssassin wrote:

Ant1010 wrote:: Strong Close goes harder then tight doubles mam, strong close is tough

Im pretty sure MY tight doubles is tuffer than your strong close.
Strong close is on lock.

I'm pretty sure my 34 rush had your tight doubles in a cage Smile

i got a diffrent one for this 1.
I didnt play you.

Yes you did lol. You were the packers and ran tight doubles and I pretty much sacked or hit u b4 u could get the ball off everytime so you kept audibling down to a run heavy thing and teying to run .. and you quit in the third and said 'im done' when I was up big and the score was so bad I decided not to post it in the thread where o was asking for games so I didn't looklike an *******

that was buffalo

» Rule Changes Poll (Audibling Down)